Archive - Interpretative Letters 
13/10/2017 
 

Interpretative Letters marked up against the last published versions (from January 2014 onwards)

With effect from 2014, we will publish a marked-up version of the Interpretative Letters to enable readers to note the changes made to the last version.

Release Date(Latest Update Date)(mm/yyyy)

Reference Number

Particulars

Listing Rules

Document Type

Content Category

03/2005 (11/2016) RL5-05 A Main Board listing applicant failing to satisfy the "ownership continuity and control" requirement of Rule 8.05(1)(c) (marked-up version issued in November 2016) Rule 8.05 (1)(c) Rejection Letter New Applicants

Superseded or withdrawn Interpretative Letters

Release Date(Withdrawal Date)(mm/yyyy)

Reference Number

Particulars

Listing Rules

Document Type

Content Category

03/2005 (10/2017) RL5-05 A Main Board listing applicant failing to satisfy the "ownership continuity and control" requirement of Rule 8.05(1)(c) Rule 8.05 (1)(c) Rejection Letter New Applicants
11/2008 (07/2014) LEGL03-08

Guidance on who constitutes a connected person of an issuer

Guidance on what procedures an issuer should adopt to ensure compliance with the connected transactions provisions in the Listing Rules

 

Rules 2.13, 14A.35, 14A.36, 14A.46 and 14A.48 No Further Disciplinary Action (Guidance) Letter Listed Issuers
02/2009 (01/2013) LEGL08-09

Guidance on the principle requiring fair and simultaneous access to information

Rule 13.09

No Further Disciplinary Action (Guidance) Letter

Listed Issuers

12/2008 (01/2013) LEGL06-08

Guidance on fair and simultaneous disclosure of potentially price-sensitive information

Rule 13.09

No Further Disciplinary Action (Guidance) Letter

Listed Issuers

11/2008 (01/2013)

LEGL02-08

Guidance on dealing with press interviews and analyst

Information regarding prospects for new business and state of order book to be included in MD&A

Rules 2.13(2),  13.09

No Further Disciplinary Action (Guidance) Letter

Listed Issuers

05/2006(09/2009)

RL17-06

Letter 1 - The Listing Division rejected the listing application of the Company as the Company failed to satisfy the Exchange that it had a business that satisfied the substance and potential requirements of GEM Listing Rule 11.12. Letter 2 - The Listing Division's rejection decision was upheld by the GEM Listing Committee.

GEM Rule 11.12

Rejection Letter

New Applicants

04/2006(09/2009)

RL11-06

Letter 1- The Listing Division rejected the application of a GEM applicant for the reason that the Company failed to demonstrate that it had a business that satisfied the substance and potential requirements of Note 3 to GEM Listing Rule 11.12. Letter 2 - The GEM Listing Committee upheld the rejection decision of the Listing Division. Letter 3 - The GEM Listing (Review) Committee reversed the decision of the GEM Listing Committee.

Note 3 to GEM Listing Rule 11.12

Rejection Letter

New Applicants

03/2005(09/2009)

RL7-05

A GEM listing applicant failing to satisfy that it had a business of substance and potential for the purposes of GEM Rule 11.12

GEM Rule 11.12

Rejection Letter

New Applicants

12/2004(09/2009)

RL2-04

A GEM listing applicant failing to satisfy the "one focused line of business" requirement of  GEM Listing Rule 11.12

GEM Rule 11.12

Rejection Letter

New Applicants

12/2004(09/2009)

RL1-04

A GEM listing applicant failing to satisfy the "one focused line of business" requirement of  GEM Listing Rule 11.12

GEM Rule 11.12

Rejection Letter

New Applicants